wanthaser.blogg.se

1. #Ptlens vs lightroom pro#
2. #Ptlens vs lightroom software#
3. #Ptlens vs lightroom code#
4. #Ptlens vs lightroom free#

#Ptlens vs lightroom pro#

I am using MacBook Pro and could not locate anything in added programs too. Now I have PTLens, DxO, Photoshop Elements 6, Lightroom 3 beta, Corel PSPX2, Photomatix and last but not least Picasa 3 Maybe Ill find out I dont need PTLens now but, too late. I could not locate Lens Correction and Vignette sliders in Filters-Distort. I have tried to correct it with Photoshop CS, I am using 5D with 24-105 f4. If someone can help, it will be appriciated. You can enhance the converging lines but getting closer to the structure, angling your camera even more and by using wider angle lenses.

#Ptlens vs lightroom free#

Just needed a little help regarding my new lens 24-105 f4. I am new to this forum, but I have been following the website for last few years. And of course, the fisheye lens works very well for fisheye images, 360° panoramas, and is wider than a rectilinear lens of the same focal length.Equipment & Techniques > Cameras, Lenses and Shooting gear īut if you don't have a normal wide-angle lens, then a fisheye lens will do in a pinch. This makes it difficult to frame your image, as it is hard to be sure how much will get cut off when you defish the photo. If you're using a fisheye, and then defishing it, what you see and what you get can be quite different (especially at 10mm, not so much at 17mm). DxO PhotoLab vs Lightroom vs Capture One - which is best for RAW files Augby Rod Lawton. With a normal wide-angle lens, what you see through the viewfinder is what you get in the final photo. Not a problem if you're only doing the odd photo, but if you're using the fisheye as a replacement for a wide-angle lens, it could get quite tedious and take up quite a bit of time.ĭefishing the photo obviously involves distorting it, and so the resultant image will very likely not be as sharp as one taken with a regular wide-angle lens.

#Ptlens vs lightroom software#

Unless you're using DXO or some other software to process your photos that can automatically defish the photo when converting the RAW file, it takes a bit of extra work to defish the photo. There are a few of problems with using a fisheye and then defishing it: So, do I think a fisheye is a suitable replacement for a normal rectilinear wide-angle lens? In short, no. And if you didn't place the horizon line around the center at the time of capture, you will find that placing the horizon center when defishing means a lot of the image will have to be cropped off. When using this method, a photo will defish okay without distortion at the left and right edges, but you will get nasty bends if you don't place the horizon line around the center of the image. I didn't know about this projection method when I did the tests, but it looks like it could work well with the fisheye, even at 10mm: The Vedutismo / Panini Projection.Īnother projection method I have tried is Equirectangular projection.

There is also another projection method that could be used instead of defishing to rectilinear - Panini / Vedutismo projection. This lower bit depth puts more constraints on image edits. The Composition AI Tool in Luminar AI gives you an AI-powered crop suggestion.

#Ptlens vs lightroom code#

SAVE 10 on Luminar AI Use offer code SDP10 at checkout. 12-bit, 14-bit, or 16-bit depth per channel for raw capture. Luminar 4: Explore Multiple Ways to Straighten Photo. I would say that the Tokina fisheye zoom is just about usable as a rectilinear wide-angle lens from 13mm upwards. Standard JPEGs provide 8 bits per RGB channel vs.